employment discrimination Guide

Employment Discrimination Pretext Section


 

Employment Discrimination Pretext Navigation


|

Employment Guide Home Page
Tell A Friend about us
Employment And Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Attorney |
The Age Discrimination In Employment Act Of 1967 |
Landmark Cases On Racial Discrimination In Employment |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
Summary On Age Discrimination In Employment Act |
Gender Employment Discrimination |
Employment Discrimination Law Part 2 |
Racial Discrimination Employment |
Employment Discrimination On The Basis Of Sexual Orientation |



Employment Discrimination Pretext Best seller

Buy it Now!



Best Employment Discrimination Pretext products

Social bookmarking
You like it? Share it!
socialize it

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter AND receive our exclusive Special Report on employment-discrimination
Email:
First Name:



Main Employment Discrimination Pretext sponsors

 

Latest Employment Discrimination Pretext link added

...

Submit your link on Employment Discrimination Pretext!



 

Welcome to employment discrimination Guide

 

Employment Discrimination Pretext Article

Thumbnail example. For a permanent link to this article, or to bookmark it for further reading, click here.


You may also listen to this article by using the following controls.

Employment Discrimination Cases That Have Helped Shape Today’s Laws

from:


Employment discrimination is an issue that touches many Americans. The landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 did away with segregation and ensured working rights for African Americans and included the famous Title VII which prohibits employers to discriminate based on race, sex, religion or national origin. Since that time, a number of employment discrimination cases have made their way to the Supreme Court and have effectively changed how employment discrimination law is practiced today. In this article, we’ll take a look at a few of the employment discrimination cases that were judged by the Supreme Court and have shaped the law as we know it today.

The first of the employment discrimination cases of note, Griggs v. Duke Power Company, dates from 1971 and was an important victory for African Americans. The Court decided that it is unlawful to expect that certain educational requirements be met or to administer intelligence tests that are not related to the job to be filled. In many cases, these requirements or intelligence tests were an underhanded way to exclude African Americans from being considered for employment.

The next of the important employment discrimination cases was an important victory for pregnant teachers – 1974’s Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur. At that time, public school boards had what would be considered archaic rules about at what point pregnant teachers would be forced to take their maternity leave. The Cleveland School Board required that pregnant teachers take unpaid leave five months before the expected childbirth and would not be permitted to return until the semester after the child reached the age of three months. Another school board noted in the case, in Chesterfield County, Virginia, required teachers to take unpaid leave four months and to give notice six months before the birth and would not be eligible for the next school year after the first day of school. The Court recognized that each pregnant teacher’s case is different and that many are able to continue working through the end of the pregnancy, making these imposed rules by the school boards violations of the pregnant teachers’ guarantee of due process.

Many of the employment discrimination cases have to do with sexual discrimination. In 1986, the case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson found that a claim of a “hostile environment” can be considered a form of sexual discrimination. The Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Serv., Inc. case in 1987 found that same-sex harassment can be considered a form of sexual harassment as covered by Title VII. In 1988, the case of Faragher v. City of Boca Raton found that an employer may be found liable for sexual discrimination caused by a supervisor, but liability will be dependant on the reasonableness of both the employers and the employee’s conduct.


 

Employment Discrimination Pretext News

Labour and Employment

On August 16, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the United States District Court for the District of Arizona's grant of summary judgment in favor of former employer Executive Jet Management ("Executive Management") against three former employees Gregory Hawn, Michael Prince and Aric Aldrich ("Plaintiffs") on their Title VII sex discrimination claims.

Read more...


WHY NATIONAL RECONCILIATION IN SRI LANKA IS NOT POSSIBLE [Paper By BRIAN SENEWIRATNE]

Website owner resources. Articles, tutorials, resources and tools including free guestbooks, free hit counters, free ad rotator and more.

Read more...


11th Circuit: Term 'Boy' Doesn't Prove Race Discrimination

During 14 years of litigation over claims that he was denied a promotion because he is black, John Hithon has twice been awarded jury verdicts of more than $1 million. His case prompted the U.S. Supreme Court to say that using the word "boy" to describe an African-American man could by itself be evidence of discrimination. But the 11th Circuit has ruled that evidence of the use of the term "boy ...

Read more...


Agoura Hills landscaping controversy is growing

By Stephanie Bertholdo bertholdo@theacorn.com A landscaping superintendent for Agoura Hills has lodged a racial discrimination complaint against the city, alleging that he was wrongly targeted for disciplinary action after he completed work at the home of City Manager Greg Ramirez. read more

Read more...


Unanimous vote means director will stay

The Sioux City Human Rights Commission voted unanimously, 10-0, Monday night to keep Karen Mackey as its executive director.

Read more...